While humanitarian aid and the protection of civilians remain the priorities of the international community, the US and its allies say that military action against Libya's President Muammar Gadhafi remains an option.
As the United States began moving warships from its Italy-based Sixth Fleet to the waters off North Africa, Gadhafi was deploying troops and military vehicles along the remote Dehiba border crossing with Tunisia and in the nearby town of Nalut which fell to opposition forces Sunday in an effort to prevent anti-regime forces taking further control of the region.
With the Libyan dictator appearing increasingly cut off from most of his country - and in turn, from the reality of the situation unfolding around his power base in Tripoli - concerns begin to grow that an already bloody uprising could turn even bloodier as Gadhafi prepares to fight to the death.
Gadhafi says he would rather die a martyr than stand down |
Hundreds if not thousands of protestors have lost their lives in Libya's uprising so far and despite numerous military defections by personnel who have refused to carry out his orders to attack civilians, Gadhafi appears to have a core of loyalists ready to lay down their lives for their leader. The dilemma now facing the international community is how long it will allow the dictator to continue with his violent suppression before military action to remove him becomes the only option.
"Given that an attempted final push on Tripoli by the opposition forces could result in mass slaughter - due to a possible imbalance in military hardware - some thought should be given to extending support to the opposition by supplying arms," Dr. Alia Brahimi, a North African specialist at the London School of Economics and Political Science, told Deutsche Welle.
"However, any mission should not aim at toppling the regime, but at protecting civilians."
Western powers especially run the risk of being accused of procrastination as their economic measures fail to stop the violence. As the numbers of dead rise, the pressure will increase on those expected to lead.
The United States has refused to take the military option off the table but it is believed that the movement of the Sixth Fleet out of dock is a show of strength rather than a prelude to air strikes or a land invasion, contrary to recent statements by Gadhafi's ally and US agitator Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez.
US discussing plans with NATO
However, UN Ambassador Rice admitted Monday that the US was in talks with its NATO partners and other allies about military options for dealing with Libya while Pentagon spokesman Colonel David Lapan said military planners were working on "various contingency plans."
US naval forces are making their way to the Libyan coast |
There are also US air bases in Aviano, Italy, and Incirlik, Turkey should the British proposal of a no-fly zone over Libya be agreed upon and the US agrees to enforce it with its own warplanes.
Elsewhere, the US has its Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain and there are still thousands of US ground troops based in Iraq should a need for a land operation arise suddenly.
Despite the options available, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters Monday that there was "no pending military action involving US naval vessels" but that they could be used for rescue missions rather than offensive operations. Should the situation in Libya deteriorate faster and more violently than expected, the emergency deployment of food, medicine and other aid would become critical.
US wary of unilateral role
The US appears to be wary of going it alone in a messy, fluid situation such as that rapidly unfolding in Libya, especially after the traumatic experiences it suffered in Somalia in the 1990s. Any US involvement would more than likely come as part of a unified UN response, one which experts believe comes with its own set of problems.
"The framing of any UN resolution authorising the use of force will need to be carefully worded if the US and UK, the two countries seemingly most urgently pressing for military action, are to secure the support of other Security Council members, especially Russia and China, countries traditionally hostile to foreign military interventions," David Hartwell, a Middle East analyst at Jane's Defense, told Deutsche Welle.
The US suffered traumatic losses in Somalia in the 90s |
"There may not be enough votes to approve this in which case, any action could only be undertaken by a coalition of the willing."
With Libya located on Europe's doorstep, Washington could pressure NATO's European members to take the lead. However, the EU as a whole lacks a cohesive security force and individual member states have already rejected the military option.
France has warned against military action, stating that humanitarian aid must be the priority in Libya.
"There appears to be no appetite outside or inside Libya for large-scale overt military assistance to the anti-Gadhafi forces; however a no-fly zone would allow the West to claim that it is facilitating the potential removal of Gadhafi at the same time as protecting the majority of the Libyan population, even though such a move would be a violation of Libyan sovereignty," Hartwell said.
Military option to protect civilians
If the opposition suffers great losses, action may be taken |
David Hartwell said that there was a danger that any intervention would allow an increasingly delusional Gadhafi to claim that the revolt against him is a foreign-inspired plot. "While this would be unlikely to alter his current predicament, the onus would remain on opposition forces to take control of Tripoli, a task expected to be accompanied by fierce fighting."
"A military intervention by outside powers at this stage threatens to seriously complicate the internal dynamic within Libya, and possibly bolster Gadhafi's position," Brahimi said.
Author: Nick Amies
_________________________________________________________________
Deutsche Welle is Germany’s international broadcaster: online, on-screen and over the air. It provides a European perspective to audiences around the world and promotes intercultural dialogue.
According to its statutory mission, Deutsche Welle will “promote understanding of Germany as an independent nation with its roots in European culture and as a liberal, democratic, constitutional state based on the rule of law.” It is also meant to "provide a forum in Europe and on other continents to German and other points of view on important issues, with the aim of fostering understanding and exchange between cultures and people.” In addition, it will contribute to promoting the German language.
Deutsche Welle fulfills this mission with a journalistic portfolio that includes DW-RADIO and the multimedia Internet portal DW-WORLD.DE in 30 languages and with DW-TV in German, English, Arabic and Spanish. It also runs the DW-AKADEMIE, where radio professionals from developing and transition countries receive further training. This will also be developed into a Master’s program in the future. The DW-AKADEMIE also offers “Intercultural Media Training” for German executives and institutions looking to go abroad.
The international broadcaster’s services are targeted to people around the world who are interested in Germany and Europe, particularly to current and future opinion leaders and decision makers. German programming is directed at those learning German and other individuals with German language skills. It reaches nearly 90 million listeners and viewers worldwide every week. It receives well over half a million responses to its programming and online services every year and is respected as a credible source of information.
_________________________________________________________________________